As businesses start growing again, there will be a tendency by some Boards of Directors and some business owners to bring in “The Change Agent”. Unless the business is in dire straights, on the verge of bankruptcy or has major image problems with it’s customers and the public, The Change Agent is not at all whom you need.
The phrase itself, change agent, has become a pejorative in the minds of many. And this has been reinforced by the likes of Chainsaw Al Dunlap and his escapades at Scott Paper (Al Dunlap was a turnaround specialist who used ruthless methods to turnaround companies like Scott Paper). And unless we think that change agents such as this are a thing of the past, look at Jack Griffin, who held the CEO position at Time Inc. for less than six months.
(http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/2011/02/jack_griffins_ouster_lessons_f.html)
Organizations do not have to be eviscerated to catalyze change. Employees do not have to be humiliated and terrorized to motivate them to action. This is naïve and ineffective behavior, let alone cruel and unprofessional. Yet, that is in effect what some change agents attempt to do.
While the idea of dramatic change may seem appealing, it is often extremely harmful to the organization to the point where it will actually deteriorate performance. Change is needed in all organizations. Organizations that do not change (and growth and adapting to growth is a form of change) will cease to perform effectively.
In any change process, however, it is important to understand what is going well, what serves as the base to build a stronger company, and who is helping and contributing to the organization (in addition to what and perhaps even who is not). Until this is done, the change agent will lack credibility, will be seen as neither respecting the culture nor understanding organizational strengths. This type of change agent will be treated like an antigen invading an organism. The antibodies will mobilize to devour it. Unfortunately, it may kill the organism in the process
It’s important to approach change rationally and in many cases this entails progressively, in the very least of approaches, to thoroughly assess what’s needed and communicate to employees and stakeholders about the change.
In this week’s Quick Tips we will look further at positive ways to affect change.
Copyright 2011 Kubica and LaForest
If you enjoyed this piece, please consider sharing it!







